Grounding conservation and development in community rights

Community-centered conservation and development social safeguards, FPIC, GEDSI, and MEL across Southeast Asia and worldwide

Ground Truth Advisory is a specialist social safeguards practice based in Bangkok, with embedded field networks across Thailand and Southeast Asia. We bring field-tested, community-centered methods to conservation organizations, protected area programs, donor-funded projects, and nature finance developers navigating IFC Performance Standards, World Bank ESF, Green Climate Fund ESP, Verra SD VISta, and Biodiversity Credit Alliance safeguard requirements.

Conservation and development work when the communities and households who bear the costs have a real voice in decisions about their land and livelihoods.

Community-first scoping

We listen to the people whose land and livelihoods are closest to the project before designing the assessment. Their knowledge, priorities, and concerns shape the methodology before any compliance framework is applied.

Justice-driven safeguards

We design safeguards for material change in how communities are treated, not just procedural compliance. Our approach draws on environmental justice frameworks that address distributional, procedural, and recognition dimensions.

Interdisciplinary rigor

We integrate ecological data and work alongside ecological teams, combining qualitative and quantitative social methods with the biophysical evidence a project already holds. The strongest assessments connect both, and we build every engagement to do that.

Clarity and transparency, always

Every engagement produces a specific, named product with a clear scope, timeline, and compliance standard. You know exactly what you will receive.

Disciplined scope

We scope each engagement to what we can deliver well and decline work outside our competence. Every assessment states what it covers, what it does not, and the standard it meets.

Communities as experts

The people living alongside conservation projects are not beneficiaries to be consulted. They are active experts with knowledge that shapes better outcomes.

Standards & Frameworks We Work With
IFC Performance Standards World Bank Environmental & Social Framework Green Climate Fund Environmental & Social Policy GCF Indigenous Peoples Policy ADB Safeguard Policy Statement CMP Open Standards for Conservation EU INTPA Safeguards Verra SD VISta Biodiversity Credit Alliance Principles Climate, Community & Biodiversity Standards TNFD LEAP CSRD ESRS E4 IFC Performance Standards World Bank Environmental & Social Framework Green Climate Fund Environmental & Social Policy GCF Indigenous Peoples Policy ADB Safeguard Policy Statement CMP Open Standards for Conservation EU INTPA Safeguards Verra SD VISta Biodiversity Credit Alliance Principles Climate, Community & Biodiversity Standards TNFD LEAP CSRD ESRS E4

Social safeguards, FPIC, GEDSI, and MEL for conservation organizations and donor-funded development programmes.

Conservation Program Design & Grant Writing

The Problem

Conservation organizations lose funding rounds because proposals lack credible social safeguards components. Funders like the Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund, Darwin Initiative, and Global Environment Facility increasingly reject applications without clear community engagement strategies.

What We Deliver

Complete proposal packages with embedded social safeguards: Theory of Change development, logframes, and community engagement plans that funders expect. Monthly fundraising retainers available for conservation organizations.

Proposals Logframes Theory of Change Fundraising Retainer

FPIC Process Design & Compliance

The Problem

Conservation organizations managing protected areas, donor-funded projects requiring IFC or GCF compliance, and biodiversity credit developers seeking Verra SD VISta or BCA certification must all demonstrate Free, Prior, and Informed Consent. Each framework's requirements differ, and most teams lack the social science expertise to design compliant consent processes that communities experience as legitimate rather than extractive.

What We Deliver

Complete FPIC process design and documentation packages: consent protocols, documentation frameworks, benefit-sharing mechanism design, and community monitoring systems formatted for your specific donor, crediting body, or institutional requirements. We design the process; your field team implements it.

Consent Protocols Documentation Frameworks Benefit-Sharing Design Community Monitoring Systems

Social Safeguards, Grievance Redress & Risk Assessment

The Problem

Conservation and development projects affect communities unevenly. Women, ethnic minorities, Indigenous peoples, and households dependent on natural resources bear disproportionate costs when safeguards are treated as paperwork rather than protection. When grievances go unheard, projects stall, lose funding, or cause harm. Most organizations lack context-specific grievance redress systems that communities trust and actually use.

What We Deliver

Community-level social risk assessments, vulnerability analyses, and grievance redress mechanism (GRM) design. We build GRMs tailored to your project geography and institutional context, including intake protocols, tracking databases, feedback loops, and staff training. Full environmental and social management frameworks to World Bank, IFC, ADB, and Green Climate Fund standards.

Grievance Redress Mechanism Design Social Risk Assessment Vulnerability Analysis Environmental & Social Management Framework

Monitoring, Evaluation & Learning Systems

The Problem

Conservation projects report monitoring data that tracks ecological indicators but cannot demonstrate whether social safeguards are functioning. Funders and verifiers are noticing.

What We Deliver

Monitoring frameworks that integrate safeguards indicators alongside ecological metrics. Participatory monitoring and evaluation protocols with community-led indicators, combined with environmental and social management packages that track whether safeguards produce real outcomes.

Monitoring & Evaluation Framework Community-led Indicator Sets Social Management Integration

Training, Capacity Building & GEDSI

The Problem

Conservation organizations need field teams trained in FPIC, social safeguards, grievance redress, and gender equality, disability, and social inclusion (GEDSI). Generic corporate responsibility training does not address the specific requirements of consent processes, safeguards compliance, or the structural inequalities that conservation interventions can reinforce.

What We Deliver

Workshops and training modules on social safeguards, FPIC implementation, GRM management, gender analysis, and social inclusion for conservation practitioners. GEDSI assessments and action plans for programs seeking to meet donor requirements on gender mainstreaming. Licensed curricula available for organizations building internal capacity.

Workshop Delivery GEDSI Assessment & Action Plans Licensed Curricula Training Materials

GEDSI, Safeguards & MEL for Development Programmes

The Problem

Donor-funded programmes must evidence gender equality, disability, and social inclusion (GEDSI), social safeguards, and results. Funders including FCDO/UK aid, DFAT, the EU (INTPA), the Green Climate Fund, the Global Environment Facility, the Asian Development Bank, the World Bank, and IFC treat GEDSI analysis, safeguards compliance, and disaggregated monitoring as conditions of funding.

What We Deliver

GEDSI analyses and action plans; social safeguards and grievance redress aligned to IFC Performance Standards and the World Bank ESF; and monitoring, evaluation, and learning systems with disaggregated indicators. Theory of change, logframes, and donor-aligned KPIs for proposals and live programmes.

GEDSI Analysis Safeguards & Grievance Redress MEL Systems Logframes & KPIs
Need a safeguards framework scoped for your project?
Request a Scoping Call

Safeguards expertise grounded in years of field research.

Tyler Nuckols
Tyler Nuckols
Founder & Principal Consultant

Most conservation teams don't carry social safeguards expertise in-house. Ground Truth Advisory delivers that work: FPIC process design, GRM development, GEDSI assessments, social risk assessment, and compliance documentation in formats that donors, conservation organizations, crediting bodies, and development finance institutions accept. Defined scope, defined timelines, defined pricing. For engagements requiring additional capacity, GTA works with a network of vetted associate consultants with complementary expertise in social assessment, gender analysis, and community facilitation.

Tyler Nuckols is a conservation social scientist specializing in social safeguards, FPIC, GEDSI, and monitoring and evaluation for conservation, development, and nature-finance projects across Southeast Asia. He founded Ground Truth Advisory and is completing a PhD in Environmental Studies at the University of Colorado Boulder.

Selected engagements

Kanchanaburi, Thailand

Social Safeguards, GEDSI, and Sustainable Agriculture for Human-Elephant Coexistence

Zoological Society of London (ZSL Thailand): Consultant, Social Safeguarding and Sustainable Agriculture

Advised a human-elephant coexistence programme working with farming communities in protected-area buffer zones, leading the social safeguarding and sustainable-agriculture workstreams. Designed GEDSI and FAIRER frameworks, FPIC and grievance-redress instruments, and monitoring and evaluation systems aligned with IFC Performance Standards and the World Bank ESF, and shaped the programme's nature-based agroforestry strategy and donor proposals. Contributed as co-author to a UK Pact GEDSI synthesis report on Thai agriculture and aquaculture supporting green-bond development, and conducted a thematic analysis of GEDSI policies and practices across Thai financial institutions.

Outcome: A safeguards, GEDSI, and monitoring package and a nature-based agroforestry strategy supporting the programme's coexistence and livelihood goals.

Social Safeguards GEDSI MEL Agroforestry
Ripening coffee cherries on the branch in a shaded agroforestry plot

Prachuap Khiri Khan, Thailand

Environmental Justice Assessment, Kuiburi National Park

Tyler's doctoral research examined how protected-area conservation around Kuiburi National Park distributes costs and benefits among the farming communities living at the forest edge. Working with a local conservation NGO and Thai research partners, he assessed human-elephant conflict governance across its structural, procedural, distributional, and recognition dimensions, identifying where governance design itself produces inequity rather than where better implementation would suffice. The work also examined how alternative-livelihood and agroforestry interventions can shift risk onto farming households, and what they require to deliver fair outcomes.

Outcome: Comprehensive environmental justice assessment, three peer-reviewed publications, and assessments for a local NGO partner on program evaluation, participant justice outcomes, and vulnerability assessment.

Environmental Justice Protected Areas PAR
Workshop with farming community members near Kuiburi National Park

New York State, USA

Equity and Environmental Justice in Climate Adaptation Policy

University of Colorado Boulder & The Nature Conservancy (Co-Investigator / Collaborator)

Conducted qualitative research on the equity implications of sea-level rise adaptation strategies in coastal and riverine communities. Responsibilities included designing and conducting interviews with buyout participants, residents, and community-based organizations; thematic coding and analysis; and contributing to two academic publications. The project identified the unintended social consequences of climate adaptation programs, such as flood buyouts and managed retreat, and proposed a justice-centered evaluation framework.

Outcome: Transferable toolkit to assess equity and procedural fairness in adaptation planning, since adapted for human-wildlife conflict contexts through doctoral research.

Publications: PLOS Climate (2023) · Global Environmental Change (2024)

Environmental Justice Climate Adaptation Qualitative Research Policy
Floodwater rushing through a swollen river

Multi-country, Asia

Facilitating Human-Elephant Coexistence through Regenerative Agroecology

USFWS Project (Co-Investigator / Collaborator)

Interdisciplinary, multi-country study investigating how agroecological systems can transition from conflict-prone to coexistence-focused regimes by understanding and shifting human and elephant behavior. The project spans four Asian countries and examines social-ecological dynamics of human-elephant conflict using quantitative surveys, ecological monitoring, behavioral assessments, and agent-based modeling. Responsibilities included developing indicators of community tolerance, designing experimental cropping interventions, and supporting participatory research with farming communities.

Outcome: Predictive model for resilience in agroecosystems and a generalizable framework for applying coexistence strategies across human-wildlife conflict contexts.

Agroecology Human-Wildlife Coexistence Mixed Methods Multi-country
Researchers on a ladder installing monitoring equipment in an agroforestry plot

Seeds of Knowledge

Professional development for conservation and development practitioners

Scope your project

Describe your project and timeline. We scope within 48 hours and send a fixed-price proposal within one week.

Based in Bangkok · Delivered Worldwide

tyler@gtadv.org
linkedin.com/in/tyler-nuckols
gtadv.org